<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://localhost:8080"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>cormacburke.me.ke - Contraception</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Amore Coniugale e Contraccezione</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/node/1352</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Amore Coniugale e Contraccezione&lt;/strong&gt; (&lt;em&gt;La Felicità Coniugale&lt;/em&gt;, Ares, Milano, 2004)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	A favore della contraccezione circola un argomento che pretende di appigliarsi a ragioni personalistiche. Si potrebbe riassumerlo così: l&#039;atto coniugale ha due funzioni, una biologica o procreativa, e una spirituale-unitiva.&lt;br /&gt;
	Tuttavia esso è procreativo soltanto in potenza, mentre, di fatto e in sé, è sempre un atto di amore: esprime realmente l&#039;amore coniugale e unisce gli sposi. Pertanto, benché la contraccezione frustri la potenzialità biologica o procreativa dell&#039;atto coniugale, essa ne rispetta pienamente la funzione spirituale e unitiva; anzi la faciliterebbe, eliminando tensioni o timori che minacciano di attenuare l&#039;espressione fisica dell&#039;amore coniugale. In breve questa tesi afferma che, mentre la contraccezione sospende o annulla l&#039;aspetto procreativo del rapporto sessuale-coniugale, ne lascia intatta la funzione unitiva.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/node/1352&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/7">Italian</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15">Contraception</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1352 at http://localhost:8080</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>La Vérité de l&#039;Amour Matrimonial et la Contraception (Angelicum, LXXI (1994), pp. 259-273)</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/node/589</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;FR&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 12pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; letter-spacing: -0.1pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Je voudrais examiner et critiquer un argument en faveur de la contraception qui pr&amp;eacute;tend s&#039;appuyer sur des raisons personnalistes.&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;On pourrait le r&amp;eacute;sumer ainsi: l&#039;acte conjugal a deux fonctions, l&#039;une biologique ou procr&amp;eacute;atrice, l&#039;autre spirituelle et unitive.&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Mais alors que l&#039;acte n&#039;est procr&amp;eacute;ateur qu&#039;en puissance, il est toujours en lui-m&amp;ecirc;me un acte d&#039;amour qui exprime r&amp;eacute;ellement l&#039;amour conjugal et unit les &amp;eacute;poux.&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;C&#039;est pourquoi, bien que la contraception &amp;eacute;limine la potentialit&amp;eacute; biologique ou procr&amp;eacute;atrice de l&#039;acte conjugal, elle respecte pleinement sa fonction spirituelle et unitive; plus encore, elle la facilite, puisqu&#039;elle &amp;eacute;limine les t&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/node/589&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://localhost:8080/node/589#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/42">French</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15">Contraception</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">589 at http://localhost:8080</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Inseparabilidad de los aspectos unitivo y procreativo del matrimonio  (Scripta Theologica, 21 (1989), pp. 197-209)</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/node/537</link>
 <description>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot; class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;b style=&quot;&quot;&gt;I.&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;La contracepcion y la union marital&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/node/537&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://localhost:8080/node/537#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/8">Spanish</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15">Contraception</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">537 at http://localhost:8080</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Married Love and Contraception (Osservatore Romano (English Ed.), Oct. 10, 1988)</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/node/282</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Married Love and Contraception&lt;/strong&gt; (&lt;em&gt;Osservatore Romano&lt;/em&gt; (English Ed.), Oct. 10, 1988) [partly updated]&lt;br /&gt;
	For years marital contraception has been considered in the West as a normal and even natural practice. As applied to marriage, the current contraceptive mentality holds that the procreative orientation or potential of spousal sexual union can be artificially and deliberately nullified, without thereby denaturalizing the conjugal act or in any way marring its capacity to effect conjugal union and give unique expression to marital love.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/node/282&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://localhost:8080/node/282#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/6">English</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15">Contraception</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">282 at http://localhost:8080</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contraception and Natural Family Planning (Letter to the Irish Press, Dublin: March 6, 1995)</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/node/281</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; letter-spacing: -0.1pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Your issue of March 1 has just reached me in Rome.&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Louise Ni Chr&amp;iacute;od&amp;aacute;in, in her article on High Court Judge Rory O&#039;Hanlon, quotes me as &amp;quot;condemning all acts of sexual intercourse that are not for procreation&amp;quot;.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; letter-spacing: -0.1pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;In protesting and totally rejecting this, may I say that one would expect a more exact reading of the sources before being accused of a position that no one in the Catholic Church holds.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/node/281&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://localhost:8080/node/281#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/6">English</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15">Contraception</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">281 at http://localhost:8080</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contraception and &#039;theology&#039; (Letter published in the Irish Times, Nov. 4, 1993)</title>
 <link>http://localhost:8080/node/280</link>
 <description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt; font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; letter-spacing: -0.1pt;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Your issue of September 21st has just reached me.&lt;span style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Your Political Correspondent, commenting on a recent Judgment of Mr. Justice Rory O&#039;Hanlon which quotes from my book &lt;i style=&quot;&quot;&gt;Covenanted Happiness&lt;/i&gt;, seems to question the propriety of a High Court Judge invoking &#039;Catholic theology&#039; on the matter of contraception.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://localhost:8080/node/280&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://localhost:8080/node/280#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/6">English</category>
 <category domain="http://localhost:8080/taxonomy/term/15">Contraception</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">280 at http://localhost:8080</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
